What is a Manuscript Critique?

When first looking into editing, you will come across a lot of different categories and types of editing. It can be hard to figure out what type of editing your book needs.

One of the very first steps in the process is receiving a manuscript critique. A manuscript critique, similar to a reader’s report from a beta reader, gives you a general overview of your book, including compliments and critiques. This does not typically include in-line edits or comments.

A manuscript critique covers:

·      Character Development

·      Point of View

·      Voice

·      Plot Structure

·      Overall Weaknesses

·      Worldbuilding (if applicable)

A manuscript critique does not cover:

·      Grammar and spelling

·      Typos

·      Dialogue

·      Repetition or redundancy

When Do You Need a Manuscript Critique?

Getting a manuscript critique is one of the first steps to take after finishing your first or second draft because it will provide you with both a first impression view of your book and a direction to go with revisions. Even if you have an idea of where to go with revisions (or you have no idea where to start), a manuscript critique can validate or challenge your initial revision ideas. It also gives you a break to mull over the manuscript, which I always recommend after finishing a draft!

How Long Does a Manuscript Critique Take?

Each editor works at a different pace and timelines will also depend on the length of your draft. That being said, they generally take less time than more extensive edits, such as a developmental edit or copy edit.

What is the Difference Between a Manuscript Critique and a Beta Read?

The main difference between a manuscript critique and a beta read is the type of feedback. A beta read typically comes from varied sources (avid readers, friends, aspiring editors, etc.) and will more likely be influenced by the beta reader’s personal point of view and the books they have read.

A manuscript assessment by an editor will focus more thoroughly on suggestions to improve the work from that editor’s expertise and experience. These critiques should be more thorough and be solution focused, whereas a beta reader’s report may simply state what works and what doesn’t.

Is a Manuscript Assessment Worth It?

Only you as the author can decide whether or not a manuscript critique is worth the time and money you spend on it. A good manuscript assessment will give you actionable feedback and a clear path for improvement in your revision process. Some may want a first impression of their manuscript for additional reassurance and direction, while others may wait until the second or third draft to pay for a developmental edit instead.

Need an affordable and in-depth manuscript critique? Request a quote today!